Can You Play Ipod Through Usb Dvd Player

Niffleheim or Welgaia

This is my entry for good and bad, since I was very clear in the last entry. I'll take it as if he had read the pass.

So.

The page where I got the information saying that it is causing a positive result in society and in ourselves. So eating is good, because you do not get hungry, you do not die and if you die there is less paperwork to do for your death and people did not get tired, your relatives will not get sad and your best friend does not commit suicide.

But equally littering would be good because you get rid of something you do not need, and that complies with the positive outcome as it could be taking up valuable space that you can use on something else and the garbage collectors have a job, make money , supporting their families and the country suffers from unemployment. Seen from a larger perspective, of course.

deifinición So this does not suit me well.

Let's find another.



Hopefully, the 'good' Wikipedia, never fails.

" Evil is the term that determines the lack of goodness must have an entity by type or destination. ^{[ 1 ]} Thus, the bad is the value placed on something that brings such a characteristic, sometimes away from what is lawful or honest, or perpetrating calamadidad Unfortunately, becoming consequence bad. [...]

Malo is a oriented concept to define something that increases the effort to get the good . For example, it is considered that wheat is good to feed the hungry nations, for all that is opposed to the achievement of this objective, it is bad. It is estimated that the individual who respects the rules and local laws, is a good person, that promotes the social system in which they live, a person who revolts by violent channels is bad. Rebellion is not always bad if conveyed by reasonable.
Many cultures recognize many levels of immoral behavior from small vices to major crimes. These beliefs are often transported to the legal system of society, with methods of trial and punishment for offenses. "

Hmmm ... but still the same. The rebellion is good if you follow lines reasonable ... But what is reasonable to be considered 'good'? Do not interfere with the ideas of others? Then it would not be rebellious.

still not convinced the concept.

Ah, I found a definition in the LJ Daniel and Anna, who says that a good person is one who fulfills that for which it was created. As the knife, the famous knife. But ... suppose we are talking about a human being.

A human is not a knife, is much more complicated. Human beings were not created (gomen, C! Syaoran), human beings are born. Then we have to define the reason why they are born, that is, for what?

And here we enter dangerous territory and the question of life: why are we here?

So this question does not answer anything XD

Pontu, I say that the reason for human existence is to destroy the world. All that hunt whales slave, what they do is 'good'. But if I say

the reason to live in peace with the ecosystem (plus I have to define that of 'alone') then vegetarians are saved and everyone else die.

Ne?

I do not like this.